Apparently, social media sites Twitter and Facebook are perfectly sufficient to keep you up to date with what’s going on in the world. Sometimes people even learn about things ahead of the main press.
That’s the conclusion of the week of huis clos (which literally means “behind closed doors”) spent by five French speaking journalists. They were shut away and asked to comment on world news using, as sole sources of information, what they could gather from Twitter and Facebook.
There are drawbacks however to using social media. One of the comments is that it’s very difficult to analyse the information you come across. It’s endless. How do you decode what you find? You have to rely considerably on your contacts. How can you decypher the notes from the noise? What happens if you don’t speak English? Or French? The #huisclosnet was classed in the top five Twitter themes in French this week yet hardly mentioned in English. How do you verify your information? Or classify it? The web uses horizontal hierarchy where traditional media structures information vertically.
140 characters is hardly sufficient to more than map out a story. Or is it? Can we content ourselves with the bare outline we receive through a Tweet? Can we really find out what’s going on in the world?
Carel Pedre is the journalist in Haiti who informed the world about the earth quake on 12 January. All the phone lines were down and his only means of communication was with Twitter via the Internet. Nicolas Willems, one of the participants in the Huis Clos was able to track him down through his Twitter contacts and finally get hold of his telephone number to talk to him in person.
There are advantages too for networking through the web.